Princess Shaw and Kutiman Talk Humble Beginnings in 'Presenting Princess Shaw' [LISTEN]
[soundcloud url="https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/266081013" params="color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false" width="100%" height="166" iframe="true" /]
When I met Princess Shaw before our interview, it was like reuniting with a long lost friend– only we've never met before and what I do know of her, I've learned through the documentary "Presenting Princess Shaw." "Hello darling," she says enthusiastically as she pulls me in for a giant hug. Not only is she the sweetest interviewee of recent memory, she is genuinely excited and humbled to be talking about the film, a story all aspiring artists can look up to. I also had the opportunity to chat with Kutiman, the musical genius who discovered her, and we talk about growing up with music in their veins, the secret to making a good song, and her reaction to seeing her face on the poster for the first time. We begin:
After I saw the film, I kept humming the songs from the film out loud, it really stuck with me.
Princess Shaw: Haha!
To you, what makes a good song?
PS: I think the lyrics, if you're really saying something, and if you have a really catchy hook– but you already know that! Most of the songs that stick with me stick with other people, and that's how I know it's a good song. But if you have deep lyrics and emotion in your voice, that makes a great song.
Kutiman: I just feel something, whatever excites me, I don't know how to explain it. Sometimes it's the melody, sometimes it's the groove, sometimes it's the lyrics.
What was life like growing up, were you always musically inclined?
K: I fell in love when I was six-years-old and I would hear my neighbor playing the piano. I grew up in a small village in the North of Isreal and I didn't know anything about music.
PS: My sister and I would write plays and sing in the choir. I would do dances and write songs, but I wasn't confident. It was a way for me to escape out of my jacked up childhood, to go somewhere else and someplace else. I had this great imagination that I would be in front of people and they'd just watch me dance and sing. It took me awhile to get that confidence, though, but I'm here now!
"It was a way for me to escape out of my jacked up childhood, to go somewhere else and someplace else."
When you saw Samantha on YouTube, did you know right away that she was someone special?
K: Yes! I had the instrumental track already and I was searching for vocals for it, and she was perfect for it. It was magical to find her... We're having a great time together [throughout this process], and I'm so thankful for that because it could have been anyone. I love spending time with her.
How did you get attached to this film?
PS: His [director Ido Haas] wife contacted me on Facebook and said he was doing a documentary on YouTubers and if I'd like to be involved. When I was first asked, I was a little weary. When I met him, there was instantly a calm about him and a sweetness, a realness and openness about him that I felt like I could be open and bear my soul. I was honored that he came all the way from Isreal to New Orleans, I was crying because, at that point, I felt like I was nobody. For someone to think I was that much of a "somebody" was an honor. So I said if I'm going to do this, I'm gonna do it all the way. From that point, we went to an open mic night [in New Orleans] and he kept following me around. Dope sauce.
Kutiman, how does it make you feel knowing that you impacted her life so much?
K: Wow, yeah it's really amazing. When I'm working on these projects I think about these [musicians] because I see them for hours and hours. Sometimes I just see a small part of their room and I think about who they are and what they do. To eventually meet one of them and see what it has done to her life is priceless.
"For someone to think I was that much of a 'somebody' was an honor."
How did you get into making these videos in the first place?
K: I was unemployed and spent a lot of time on YouTube, I saw a lot of videos and piano, guitar, and drum tutorials to improve my own playing. I had a lot of the videos open in different tabs and I thought, 'hmm I this could work.'
What was it like seeing your face on the poster for the first time?
PS: I had no idea the documentary had taken another turn [just following me] and so when I went to Isreal, I walked into Ido's house. I turned around and saw the poster and said, "What the 'bleep'?!" It was just my face. I was like are you serious? Ido held that [secret] in for a long time, I knew that was killing him, haha. I just couldn't believe it, it was my face up there. My name's in there.
Are you going to take a poster and hang it in your house?
PS: When I went to the Baton Rouge Film Festival in Lousiana, they had this huge banner hanging over the balcony of my face. They sent that to me. I can't put it anywhere, it's so big!
I heard there is a full-length album in the works!
K: When Samantha was in Isreal, I knew that I wanted to do more music with her, and not the YouTube way. We recorded a lot of songs in a studio and now I'm working on the music.
"I feel like there is so much fakeness out there and I think this film is about hope and being real."
What was the film festival experience like?
K: It was amazing! I play in bands and when you perform, you have to go on stage and people [judge you] and you have to work hard to get their love. Here they just play the film and after everyone clapped, like "Yay we love you." Haha. It's like going just to the encore [of my band's performance]. Now, every time I go into a cinema and I hear the audience clapping, I feel like they're falling in love with Samantha through the film. It's unforgettable.
PS: Seeing myself on film is crazy. I was like, "I'm fat! Hold your stomach in! Look at your hair!" I was sitting in the theater thinking they hate it. But then they started clapping. Then I saw there was a line of people waiting to talk to me, I was like wow. I remember this one lady who is a survivor of childhood abuse, but she's struggling, and she was hugging me and crying. She thanked me, saying I gave her courage to tell her story. I'll always remember that lady.
If people could take away one thing after watching "Presenting Princess Shaw," what would you want that to be?
K: Something about being real, honest and open. I feel like there is so much fakeness out there and I think this film is about hope and being real.
PS: I want you to go away feeling good about life, and realize you can make it through. Sometimes you don't get to live that fabulous life, but you should be ok in your life and be successful in everything you do. It doesn't have to be in front of a crowd of people– be successful with whatever you do in life. You don't have to be famous to be successful, success is here (points to her heart).
For our review of "Presenting Princess Shaw," click here.
Former Cult Member Recalls Life as a Brainwashed 'Disciple' in 'Holy Hell'
Movies about cults and the mysteries behind religious organizations usually always make for a fascinating watch. Take Alex Gibney's Emmy-Winning documentary "Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief," which provided an in-depth look at the infamous Tom Cruise-beloved organization. A handful of films currently streaming on demand also shed light on various cults, including the L.A.-bred "The Source Family," the evangelical "Jesus Camp" and "Kidnapped for Christ." With a plethora of this type of films already available for viewing, what makes director Will Allen's documentary "Holy Hell" unique is that for 22 years, he was a member of the Buddhafield Cult, the same cult he is now exposing.
Executive produced by Jared Leto, "Holy Hell" shows how one man's search for the truth unexpectedly lead him down a dark path of brainwashing, sexual abuse, and all around mental torture. Allen, who also narrates the film, explains his how he was introduced to "The Buddhafield" by his sister Amy in the mid-eighties. He recalls meeting The Teacher, a flamboyant man named Michel, who was the leader of the organization. Taking a liking to Allen quickly, Michel designates him as the group's filmmaker. That footage is what makes up most of this documentary, and it is as chilling and the process as stereotypical as one might expect.
The first act of the film shows beautiful hippie types, barely dressed and frolicking through the forest, hallucinating on happiness. However, the red flags surrounding The Teacher becomes more the forefront of the film as we discover that this organization, which sets out to achieve growth and "The Knowing" (the ability to meet God), is really evolving into mental manipulation to feed Michel's narcissistic, maniacal ego.
"Holy Hell" takes twists and turns that are hard to digest, and this is only further supported by the endless amount of archival footage from Allen's camera. At times, it is heartbreaking; forced abortions, severing ties with loved ones, and the rampant occurrence of sexual abuse continues to evoke an emotional response from those who recount those experiences. One male member, in particular, describes being sexually abused by Michel every Monday for five years. It takes around two decades, but eventually enough of the pieces fall into place allowing some members to see the Buddhafield for what it truly is: a cult. It took Will Allen 22 years to figure this out before he finally left the group in 2007.
"Holy Hell," which premiered at this year's Sundance Film Festival, is a creepy but fascinating watch and a good addition to the ever-growing genre of "religious cult" films. The film so accurately portrays Allen's memory of the Buddhafield because he was literally the one shooting the footage during those years.The film captures Allen’s 180-degree shift in attitude from finding the truth to exposing a monster, condensing 22 years into a 100-minute runtime. While the ending of the film seems a bit silly– "Snow Patrol" by Chasing Cars plays to a music video of "disciples" aka group members in white shirts and pants dancing in a meadow– the parting words are enough to make us do a double take: "You've got a cult in your town, I almost guarantee it." Consider us warned.
"Holy Hell" is not rated. Opens in theaters on Friday, 5/27.
'Presenting Princess Shaw' is a Cinderella Story for the Millennial Generation
Every day, countless people post pictures on Instagram or videos on YouTube in hopes of their big break. That modeling contract or singing career is a dream for so many and just a short time ago, Princess Shaw was among the millions hopeless romantics, posting videos on her YouTube channel. Though she was among the crowd, Princess is different. Not only is her talent unmatched, her energy and natural charisma caught the eye of just the right person who not only helped her achieve her musical goals but also gave her the confidence to believe in herself. Filmmaker, Ido Haar's documentary, "Presenting Princess Shaw," is an inspiring portrait of a girl who deserves the world’s recognition, and with hard work and a bit of luck, is able to see her dreams come true.
The man who discovered Princess's untapped talent is Israeli artist Ophir Kutiel, who goes by the pseudonym Kutiman, and the film opens with him. Kutiman is a man of few words, but a gifted musician, creating virtual symphonies solely through user-generated YouTube videos. As he was looking for vocals to lay on top of an instrumental track he was working on, he finds Princess's YouTube channel, flooded with tons of original songs she wrote and performed, and devotes his time to watching every last one. Kutiman decides to use one of her songs, "Give It Up," and surprise Princess by uploading the finished piece to YouTube without telling her, leaving it to her fans and friends to share the big news.
Meanwhile, in a lower class neighborhood of New Orleans and unaware of any such surprise, "Princess Shaw" aka Samantha Montgomery, 38, is struggling to make ends meet. Working as a nurse, she barely can afford rent, let alone car payments when her car breaks down and tires get stolen, leaving her with little mobility. Still, her positivity and radiance continue to shine through her vocals, which she exudes at any chance she gets. From singing with strangers on the street to the elderly in the hospital, Princess Shaw is the epitome of a ray of sunshine. However, her songs are not always so cheery. A survivor of sexual abuse, Princess's songs run deep with emotional lyrics and raw emotion. Her life's story has been a turbulent one, and so we are happily rooting for her when we see her dreams coming true before our eyes.
Ido Haar's unique construction of this documentary brings two people from opposite sides of the world together to create beautiful music. It is a heartwarming testament to the age-old saying that the universal language is music, which as a whole, is inspiring. There are a few aspects of the film that seemed to drag a bit, at times it feels as if we are exclusively scrolling through Princess's YouTube feed as opposed to watching the film. The film also cuts back and forth from Louisiana to Israel frequently, and I felt like the scenes with Kutiman at home seemed overly staged, forcibly taking me out of the naturalistic, documentary setting.
A lot of stars had to align in order to make this documentary, let alone make it successful. First, finding the talent, the needle in the haystack of countless YouTube hopefuls dying for their big break. Plus, keeping the big reveal a secret to Princess until literally the moment she discovered the video online. Also, the reception of the song, "Give It Up," was not immune to criticism, so there was no way of knowing just how well the song would be accepted. Then there is the personality of the star, Princess, and how she would translate on camera. Director Ido Haar took a risk by counting on all of these components to work out, and his risk paid off in insurmountable ways. Director Ido Haar took a risk by relying on all of these components to work out, and his risk paid off in insurmountable ways. Not only has he created an inspiring story of hope and perseverance, he has essentially re-made the Cinderella story for the millennial generation.
"Presenting Princess Shaw" is not rated. Opens in theaters, on iTunes, Amazon video, and VOD on Friday, 5/27.
Greta Gerwig and Director Rebecca Miller Talk Female Empowerment in 'Maggie's Plan' [LISTEN]
[soundcloud url="https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/265088376" params="color=ff5500&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false" width="100%" height="166" iframe="true" /]
A few weeks back, I caught a screening of "Maggie's Plan" at the ArcLight Hollywood. A few months after its Sundance premiere, the film made its way to Los Angeles and delighted the audience with its offbeat edgy humor about love and relationships. Following the screening, Pete Hammond of Deadline conducted a Q&A with director Rebecca Miller and Greta Gerwig, who, after enduring a red carpet photo shoot earlier in the evening, promptly took off her heels as she sat down in front of the large crowd. Gotta love Gerwig.
From my knowledge of your work, this is your first real "comedy," is that something you were looking to do at this point?
Rebecca Miller: Yeah, I like to hear people laugh in my movies and so I thought I would flip around the ratio of sadness to happiness.
It says it's based on a story by Karen Rinaldi, from an unfinished book. How did you stumble upon an unfinished book?
RM: Karen is one of my best friends and she sent it to me, the Maggie chapters, in an email. Her book, The End of Men, will be published in a year. She sent me four chapters that had Maggie, Odette, and John with the basic premise of a love triangle with the switch. I thought it was such a great idea, so I tried to make it into a screenplay.
What was your inspiration?
RM: Definitely comedies of the 1940s, the genre of "comedies and marriage" specifically.
Greta, this is another great role for you, and you were involved very early on, correct?
Greta Gerwig: Yeah, Rebecca and I had over a year to talk about it and prepare and dream up what it is, which was a real luxury. I knew I wanted to be in the movie because I loved Rebecca's other work and really admired her. I also loved the story and how it kept surprising me, it felt like I was forever reassessing my position of where I thought this narrative was going to go. I found it incredibly romantic but also very truthful about the complexities of love and life. I thought it answered a lot of what I feel.
Maggie is very truthful, there is a line you walk with this character.
GG: I know that Maggie does some things in the movie that, on the face of them, could be hard to take in as an audience member, but I just felt like, on the page, it rendered so beautifully. She had a shining inner truth and a compass of where she was going in the language and the way she chose to live her life that I felt like, that's going to win the day. You just play the honesty of that and it will all fall into place.
Julianne Moore is such a hoot in this movie, that Danish accent is perfect.
RM: She was originally French in the story but I thought she should be from the further North because I thought that somebody who would write the book Bring Back the Geisha and be tolerant of affairs is, to me, more Northern European. I also thought nobody hears Danish accents so much. My mother had an accent that nobody could ever imitate, it was from many European countries, so [Julianne] developed an accent that's very specific to the character. We talked about everything, even the fact that she should have a really tight topknot on the top of her head. It was a nice collaboration with her.
Did it help to have a female power behind the scenes?
GG: Oh yeah, I think Rebecca is a special director because of who she is as a person more than her gender, much more than her gender. I think directors are...directors. They're all control freaks. Haha, in a good way! You want them to be that way. They're amazing, they're world builders. So in that sense, it's no different than working with a male director.
One of your co-stars Ethan Hawke actually said, astoundingly to him, he had never worked with a female director before "Maggie's Plan" in his entire 30-year career.
RM: Yeah and he's done 40 something films. It is surprising, it's kind of a bad statistic.
Greta, you're actually turning to directing now too with your first film "Ladybird."
GG: That's right, I'm working to change those statistics. I'm very excited about it. I've written it, haven't done it yet, so hopefully we're recreating this moment when I'm done with it.
For our review of "Maggie's Plan," click here.
'Maggie's Plan' is a Wonderfully Crafted Film About a Crazy Little Thing Called Love
Thanks to the likes of pop-culture entertainment such as "Sex and the City" and practically everything in Woody Allen's filmography, the Millennial generation has come to believe that finding true love in the concrete jungle that is New York City is among the most romantic of notions. Director Rebecca Miller defies this fantasy with her new film "Maggie's Plan," a wonderfully crafted film for the intelligentsia-sect that takes one woman's quest of subverting modern romantic convention by artificial insemination, leading to a hilarious deconstruction of uncharted adult life.
The woman with the plan is Maggie Hardin (Greta Gerwig), an independent, plaid-coat loving, thirty-something educator with babies on the brain. After complaining to her friends (played by the perfect comedic duo Bill Hader and Maya Rudolph) that she is incapable of loving someone for longer than six months, she decides that now is the time to start thinking about having children of her own, on her own, which leads her to a brilliant-but-miswired sperm donor (Travis Fimmel), who works as an artisan pickler.
Things get tricky when Maggie simultaneously meets and falls for fellow teacher John Harding (Ethan Hawke), a charming anthropology professor and struggling novelist whose round-wired spectacles perfectly compliment his geek-chic attire. Maggie thinks she's found "the one" in John, despite him already being married to the stone cold intellectual Georgette Harding (Julianne Moore), which doesn't stop an instantaneous affair. Flash forward a few years, and Maggie, now with a smiling infant girl, realizes the tangled web she's woven when the reality of her life with John sets in and is nothing like she thought it would be.
Rebecca Miller paints the portrait of a 21st-century relationship in such a realistic way, where one's expectations of certain things tend to trump reality. In Maggie's case, she wanted a child and love, and at first, she thought she successfully constructed it. The dynamics that set the tone of the relationship in the beginning, however, quickly shift, drowning Maggie in the process. Her ideal relationship where both partners were artistically satisfied turn into a one-way street, where Maggie is the bridge over John's troubled water.
With such artsy hits as "Frances Ha" and "Mistress America," Greta Gerwig has more or less become the go-to actor for the un-stereotypical NYC-dwelling hipster heroine and, as in the aforementioned films, she brings her signature bright-eyed optimism to the big screen. Her honest portrayal of Maggie is equally matched by Ethan Hawke's John, the self-tortured artist who becomes so wrapped up in his own wants and needs that he doesn't realize how much his actions are damaging his relationships. The Academy Award-winning Julianne Moore and her unexpected Danish accent prove that, given the right material, she is as much a comedic force as she is a dramatic one. Together, these three actors don't just provide superfluous laughs, they also strike sensitive chords at just the right moments, giving the film a lasting, full-bodied experience.
At its core, "Maggie's Plan" is an unconventional romantic comedy that also serves as a dose of therapy for those who may be feeling at a crossroads in their own personal lives. Maggie is a complex character with flaws, and that is exactly what makes her such a compelling character to root for. Maggie's plans pivot within each act, all to hilarious results. From choosing a sperm donor to raise a child on her own, to wanting a child with her lover John, to wanting to leave John and go back to the way things were, Maggie shows us that it is ok to change one's mind, and that what seemed like a good thing at one point in our lives may not be in our future selves' best interests.
No matter your age, we may not have everything figured out, and that's ok. It is ok to make mistakes, especially if those mistakes bring you closer to figuring out who you really are, and what you really want. However, if there is one thing we can take away from Maggie Hardin's experience, it's that sometimes, the best plan, is no plan.
"Maggie's Plan" is rated R for language and some sexuality. Playing at the ArcLight Hollywood 5/20.
'Almost Holy' Director Steve Hoover on Taking Risks in Ukraine
The last time I spoke to director Steve Hoover, it was about his latest Sundance award-winning documentary, "Blood Brother." Since then, he has been busy making his second feature-length documentary "Almost Holy," a powerful and culturally charged film that profiles homeless youth in Ukraine and one man's mission to save them all. That man's name is pastor Gennadiy Mokhnenko, and his story is nothing short of inspiring despite the dire circumstances. In our interview with Steve, we talk about the biggest risk he took in making the film, working with composer Atticus Ross, and the meaning behind the film's title. We begin:
The last time we talked, it was about your film "Blood Brother", which fits very much into the same vein as "Almost Holy". What draws you to these raw, hard-hitting documentaries?
I can't say I'm drawn to the subject in particular, there are a lot of parallels with a strong central character trying to help children. My friends had gone on a trip and were working on a project in Ukraine and had met Gennadiy. They had essentially detoured from the project they were doing and followed him for a few days. They had approached him about being the subject of a documentary and he was open to it, so they asked me to direct it. Initially, I was a little hesitant because of all of these parallels but when I saw Gennadiy on camera, he just had this strong presence and I was interested in him. Just him as a character was something I wanted to understand.
When we talked last time, you said something about "not being able to fully capture the experience on camera." Do you feel the same way with this film?
Going to India to film "Blood Brother" was the most exotic place I had been, so part of what I was saying was just the experience of that was a hard thing to communicate. Also the experience of meeting those kids. Ukraine is such a different place than India, there is some familiarity there but also an incredible disconnect. I didn't speak the language so that was another confusing element. I tried really hard to capture and show some of the feelings I had being there. There were so many nuances to every story that Gennadiy was involved in, not all of that can fit into an hour and a half long film.
Was there any apprehension from your friends and family when you told them that you were heading to Ukraine to film?
I have traveled a lot for shoots, so initially, not really. When we started filming, the conflicts and protests hadn't begun yet so Ukraine was, from all we could tell, a fairly safe place. I was planning a second trip, but since then, violence had broken out, mostly in the West. There were government warnings saying not to travel but we went anyway. So yeah, people didn't feel great about that because it was dangerous then.
Has Gennadiy seen the film?
He has, he was there at the Tribeca premiere. He had a pretty intense emotional reaction to the film, he hadn't seen a lot of that archival footage for years.
Terrance Malick's attachment to this film must have been a huge deal.
Yeah, he offered creative input, so it was nice to have him as a resource.
Same with Atticus Ross I'm sure.
Atticus was great to work with, he was very involved in the process. It's great to have somebody like that to bounce ideas off of. Atticus came in early on, he had assembled some works in progress in the same aesthetic and direction we were headed. We felt like he could really compose a sound that would be fitting for Ukraine.
Can you tell me why you changed the title from "Crocodile Gennadiy" to "Almost Holy"?
There is a moment in the film when he brings a pedophile into the police station and the guy sort of calls him out, saying Gennadiy was lying. He said, "I thought you were holy," and Gennadiy says, "Almost." It was this really intense, under-the-breath exchange between the two of them. This was the name I wanted to call it originally, the working title was "Gennadiy" which is a really common name in Russia. I initially thought it was interesting because Genaddiy is such an uncommon person but it's one of those names that people can't remember, they can't spell, half of the time can't pronounce. As the film developed, the "Crocodile" came in there, but it's a hard title for people to stick with, so we ended up switching it to "Almost Holy."
What was the biggest risk you took in making the film?
The biggest physical risk was going back to Ukraine during a time of high political tension. For me, it's probably something that I will never do again. Some stories might be work risking your life for, but I can't imagine that I will ever be following a story like that.
For our review of "Almost Holy," click here.
'Almost Holy' Is a Raw, Unfiltered Look at Homeless Youth in Ukraine
In 2013, Steve Hoover's directorial debut Blood Brother premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, where it went on to win the U.S. Documentary Grand Jury Prize and the Audience Award. Blood Brother tells the story of American humanitarian Rocky Braat who traveled to a poverty-stricken, HIV-infected orphanage in India determined to give the children a sense of family that they, and himself never had. Now, Hoover is back with another social justice documentary with an even darker tone in Almost Holy, which profiles local Ukrainian pastor Gennadiy Mokhnenko who, unlike Braat, only has to turn to his own backyard to singlehandedly try to solve the rise of homeless and drug-addicted kids.
The film begins in 2012 in the Pilgrim Republic, a children's rehab center started by Gennadiy, and right away we are thrust into the chaotic and messy reality for all who stay there. Children as young as seven and eight have track marks on their tiny, frail arms from heroin, others are dying of blood infections. Most are orphans and those who do have living parents have lost them to a lifestyle consumed by alcohol and drugs. It is a terrible sight made worse by the fact that even earnest attempts to help the children don't cut it. Ambulances are equipt with just bench seats, no oxygen, nor electrical life-saving devices to speak of. Despite all of these odds stacked against him, pastor Gennadiy has bravely committed his life to end child homelessness by any means necessary.
Gennadiy, speaking to the camera in broken English, explains that since the breakout of the Soviet Union, there has been an exponential problem with children living on the streets and in manholes. His tireless efforts are seen during night raids, where Gennadiy and a small team forcibly abduct street kids and take them to the Pilgrim Republic. We watch as desperate children crawl out from trash piles and broken down cars, sewer pipes and gutter shacks. They are transported to the center and given a meal, a shower, and a fresh start. Gennadiy's hope is that these children will get adopted out to loving families. His ultimate goal? To shut down the Pilgrim Republic, to have no use for it anymore. Essentially, to solve the problem of child homelessness in Ukraine.
There are many people who consider him a folk hero, however, he faces adversity from those who call him a "lawless vigilante." He explains that the common attitude toward the issue is "it's not my problem," and so he takes it upon himself to intervene in a kid's dangerous, and potentially deadly, lifestyle. "If I don't," he says with sorrow, "who else will?"
Let me reiterate the intensity of the film by saying this: I watched Almost Holy while eating lunch, and some of the scenes were so intense and explicit, I literally lost my appetite (and ended up tossing my half-eaten chicken breast in the trash). Hoover managed to hook and pull me into the dismal and dark streets of Ukraine so vividly, it is fully captivating. As a filmmaker, that is a wonderful feat– to affect audiences so much that they have a visceral reaction to what they're watching on screen. As a human being, however, it is a hard thing to witness.
Almost Holy, executive produced by Terrence Malik and with a powerful score by Atticus Ross, is a stunning cinematic portrayal of one man's mission to save, but it is hard to stomach (literally). The message is important and Gennadiy is a fantastic narrator, his passion for the children is extremely affecting. Before you watch Almost Holy (which I recommend you do), be mentally prepared for a vivid and raw viewing experience. Personally for me, great films linger in my mind for days after viewing and this is definitely one of those films.
Almost Holy is rated R for disturbing content involving drugs and alcohol, sexual references and language. Opens at the Sundance Sunset on Friday, 5/20 and nationwide 5/27.
'The Lobster' Director Yorgos Lanthimos Talks Intentional Irony [LISTEN]
Yorgos Lanthimos should be on your radar. The 42-year-old director, born in Athens, Greece, is a visionary unlike any other in modern cinema. Bringing strange and surreal worlds to the big screen with such confidence, his past feature films "Dogtooth" and "Alps" have won numerous awards (as well as an Academy Award nomination for Best Foreign Language Film). "The Lobster" is his third feature film, first in English, and in true Yorgos fashion, he finds the perfect balance between sharp-edged satire and romantic fable in such a way that is such to make "The Lobster" among the best films of 2016. We sat down with Yorgos at the Four Seasons Hotel in Beverly Hills earlier this week, and we talked about his directing process, Colin Farrell's weight gain, and his on-set nervous breakdown. We begin:
https://soundcloud.com/cinemacy/director-yorgos-lanthimos-talks-the-intentional-irony-in-the-lobster?si=affc9baf59a649a7b93547da6eefec48&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing
Visually, this film is very loud; I'm wondering what a "Yorgos" script looks like? Do you create mood boards, that include pictures?
Not at all, actually. Our scripts are very sparse and simple. I mean, they don't even have descriptions of the characters or their emotions, what they're going through, etc. They just describe the action and dialogue. The way I like to make films is to take one part of the process at a time. When we're writing the screenplay, I'm very much focused on that and trying to feel confident about it.
I only start making a film when I feel the screenplay is there and I feel confident it can be made into a film. I never think about what it's going to look like, who's going to be in it, where we're going to do it or any of those things. The next step is thinking about what fits this film visually, and what actors can make the characters on the page more complex and interesting. Then it is filming and editing where I make more decisions, I try different kinds of music and find the language there.
Can you talk about the different societies that have very strict rules? Neither place seems like an enjoyable place to live.
That's the thing, I think the irony is that there is not much contrast. What I was interested in is showing the irony of one character who escapes from one system believing that he can be free in a different system. Even the Loners themselves, they're supposedly free because they're going against the system but the irony of it is in order to create this other system they have to have their own rules as well. That ends up being very similarly oppressive. I like that irony. I think it poses questions about whether you are ever free to think or feel the way you want.
"I like that irony. I think it poses questions about whether you are ever free to think or feel the way you want."
How did you choose Colin Farrell?
I always liked Colin. Any actor who can star in In Bruges to A New World to Total Recall has range and can do great things. I like to watch interviews that actors do when I'm thinking about casting to get a different sense of them, apart from their film roles. I saw that he could be someone who could enrich the character.
Did you ask him to put on the weight?
I did! We discussed it the first time we spoke. We met on Skype, and we didn't have much to talk about. I don't like discussing the screenplay too much so we talked more about practical things. He asked me what I thought David looked like. I told him that I thought he would be slightly softer, someone who has lived a long life with his wife and was comfortable. He said, 'Oh yeah I was thinking he could be very thin' because he was trying to avoid putting on weight. I just thought that if he was extremely thin, that would make him feel much more miserable as a character and more depressive.
"I just thought that if he was extremely thin, that would make him feel much more miserable as a character and more depressive."
David initially turns down the proposition from the biscuit lady, even though he only has 45 days to find a mate. What does that say about his character?
He wasn't as desperate at that point but became more desperate later down the line. Then he became so desperate he wasn't playing by the rules anymore. What I've now realized about the film, watching it after we made it, is that he was very offended when Ben Whishaw's character started lying to be with someone. I think that hurt him as a vulnerable and honest character. But in the end, he resorts to that himself.
This film is very bold, there are a lot of unique ideas that have never been seen before. That said, I'm sure there were a lot of challenges in creating the world of The Lobster.
Well, this time around we were creating a bigger world. There was a larger scale that was necessary to achieve. Making films that do not necessarily fit in a box makes it hard to convince people to invest in them. So yeah, that part of the process was hard. For me personally, moving from making very small films in Greece essentially with my friends and having them offer their services or whatever they could to make those films and entering into a more proper film structure meant that I had to work very much like the characters in the film– with very specific rules.
This time, it wasn't as flexible as it was when I was just making films with my friends. On the other hand, there were a lot of benefits coming from it. I was able to work with more means and able to achieve what we wanted to achieve. I was able to work with great actors who were very committed and supportive.
"There were times you would distance yourself from the film and just be like, 'What the hell are we doing?' We had camels walking around, crazy animals..."
What were your most memorable moments from this experience?
I was stressed the whole time. I don't know what to pick, I was having a nervous breakdown the whole time. It's always like that. There were times you would distance yourself from the film and just be like, 'What the hell are we doing?'. We had camels walking around, crazy animals... There were instances like that where we would just start laughing about the situation.
1 h 58 min. Rated R for sexual content including dialogue, and some violence. Now playing in select theaters, including the ArcLight Hollywood.